Wednesday, March 18, 2020
Same-Sex Marriage
Same-Sex Marriage Same-Sex MarriageSame-sex marriage is something that should be legal everywhere. The discrimination against homosexuals in the sense of marriage is a denial of equality and it is immoral to deny them of this right. Same-sex marriage is just as sacred as heterosexual marriage, so why is it illegal?Same-sex marriages should be just as legal as heterosexual marriages. Just because something is different, doesn't make it immoral. Although many people view same-sex marriage as "unnatural" and "abnormal," there are many things that people value that are unnatural in some sense. Everyone deviates from the norm in some way whether it be their clothing, their political views, or their hobbies. Banning something that deviates from the norm makes no logical sense. Therefore, banning same-sex marriage for deviating from the norm is wrong because not everything that is unnatural is immoral. The norm, in this sense, is traditional marriage. The definition of marriage is "A formal union that exists between a man and a woman, typically recognized by law, by which they become husband and wife."Same Sex MarriageObviously most people engage in heterosexual relationships, but does it follow that it is wrong to engage in homosexual relationships? Very few people are ambidextrous, fluent in 5 different languages, play the triangle, or breed goats, yet none of these are immoral because they are unusual. Many may say that since some of these are things that people choose to do, then that means that homosexuality must also be a choice.Homosexuality is not a choice. Homosexuals are born the way that they are, therefore it is natural and good to form homosexual relationships. Relationships that should eventually be allowed to be recognized by law. To deny homosexuals of something that is natural and good is discriminatory and wicked. Although this argument is strong, it...
Monday, March 2, 2020
Mary Higgins Clark - Most Recent Releases
Mary Higgins Clark - Most Recent Releases Mary Higgins Clark has thrilled readers for years with her psychological suspense novels. Called the Queen of Suspense, all of Clarks books are fast and enjoyable reads that will make your mind race. Heres a list of Mary Higgins Clarks works along with her newest books and upcoming releases. How many books have you read?à Ive Got You Under My Skin Published inà April 2014, Ive Got You Under My Skinà quickly rose to the top of the ranks and became a #1 New York Times bestseller. This crime-filled novel follows Laurie Moran- a television producer whose husband was murdered. The murderer is still at large and Laurie fears the killer will come back for her son and herself. At the same time, Laurie is coincidentally producing a true-crime, cold case files television show. On set, secrets unravel and the show somehow connects to the murder of Lauries husband. à The Cinderella Murder Released on November 18, 2014, this book immediately follows Ive Got You Under My Skin and is actually an extension of the storyline. In this collaboration with Alafair Burke, Mary Higgins Clark starts a new series titled Under Suspicion. These books are about a TV series that covers cold case murders, and the main character is the same Laurie Moran as inà Ive Got You Under My Skin.à The Sleeping Beauty Killer The third book in the Under Suspicion series, Mary Higgins Clark and Alafair Burke bring fans another page-turning thriller.à Released in November 2016, the novel continues to follow the drama of Laurie Morans life. Laurie gives it her all in trying to salvage Casey Carters reputation. Casey was convicted of murdering herà fiancà © 15 years ago, but Laurie believes she is innocent. But is she? The Sleeping Beauty Killer keeps readers guessing until the very end.à As Time Goes By News reporter Delaney Wright wants to find her birth mother, but at the same time, she is assigned to cover the high-profile murder trial involving Betsy Grant. To help out, Delaneys friends look into the mystery surrounding her birth, but in the process learn about a secret they are not sure Delaney should know. Meanwhile, evidence against Betsy is growing, but Delany believes she is innocent and tries to prove it. Released in April 2016, As Time Goes By is filled with suspense and written in Clarks classic style. à All By Myself, Alone Trying to escape the public eye after the mortifying arrest of her fiance the day before their wedding, Celia Kilbride boards a luxury cruise ship. There, she meets the wealthy Lady Em who owns a priceless emerald necklace. A few days later, Lady Em is found dead and the necklace is gone.à In a series of who-did-it speculations, Celia tries to solve the mystery case and in the process puts herself in danger. Mary Higgins Clarks latest release,à All By Myself, Aloneà is expected to be published on April 4, 2017.
Friday, February 14, 2020
Some Aspect of Early Victorian Period in John Stuart Mill's The Essay
Some Aspect of Early Victorian Period in John Stuart Mill's The Subjection of Women - Essay Example Mrs. Mallard, the main character of the story is told that her husband has died in a train crash. With this information she sits throughout the story and moves forward in her life at least in her mind. The reader is told that Mrs. Mallard has a heart condition in the beginning of the story. Mrs. Mallard describes her plight with her husband. She cannot talk about anything she wants to talk about, she gets ignored and she has to mind her place. Mrs. Mallard resolves herself that she is finally free and she goes through a shift in her consciousness and decides what she will do next. Unfortunately at the end of the story she finds that her husband did not die in the train crash and her only way out now is to have a heart attack and die; which she does at the end. The short story does show how she was expected to listen to him and do what he said which supports what Mill says. An interesting point is that women today are not much different from women then although they have worked hard towards getting a voice. Kuhl describes spinsterhood during this time and the fact that women were to have "high moral standards" and that they were to adhere to "strict rules of conduct in marriage and courtship." Specifically she states: Based on high moral standards, strict rules of conduct in marriage and courtship, and a public lifestyle that would reflect pious dignity, women of the Middle Class were carefully conditioned and expected to live up to a specific code of behavior. The ultimate goal of which was marriage. It became the duty of every woman of the Middle Class to marry and produce children, preferably boys to inherit the newfound status and wealth of the class (par. 3). This statement creates an image of slavery for women of this time period because they were more breeding stock than part of a marriage. They were expected to do only what the man said and which is
Sunday, February 2, 2020
Environmental theory Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words
Environmental theory - Essay Example ?s othernessââ¬â¢ requires not identifying oneself (or oneââ¬â¢s own interests, or indeed humanity or humanityââ¬â¢s interests) with wider nature, and recognizing that wider nature is not merely an extension of human culture (i.e., its material resource). Similarly, liberal ââ¬Ëpolitical reasonablenessââ¬â¢ requires accepting neutrality the level of the justification of principles of justice; one should not expect them to enshrine oneââ¬â¢s own conception of the goodâ⬠(1). With nature considered to be something existent unto itself, it must be considered within the framework of political liberalism. Having presented his argument and attempted to make it clear, the author then moves on to explore what he means more fully regarding ecological justice. This process starts with a more thorough exploration of what it might mean to take a non-instrumental view of nature and how to consider what it would mean to respect natureââ¬â¢s otherness. Essentially, he describes ââ¬Ënature as otherââ¬â¢ as something ââ¬Å"independent of, or not determined by, the significances attributed to it, and the modifications made to it, within local landscapesâ⬠(2). While he acknowledges that this is an imprecise definition, he also makes the case that it is precise enough for the purposes of his argument. To determine what it means to respect natureââ¬â¢s otherness, he then presents what he terms three fundamental truths that must be kept in mind. The first of these is that ideas of ââ¬Ëawe and humilityââ¬â¢ must be given priority over concepts of arrogance and superiority over nature as it simply exists. This suggests that humans should ââ¬Å"maintain a respectful distanceâ⬠from the idea of nature by avoiding making any express demands on it. This includes making any attempt to put its resources to meeting human consumption demands or to involve it as an object of human adoration. The two additional truths include the No Teleology Thesis and the Autonomy Thesis, each of which assert the concept
Friday, January 24, 2020
Leadership In Julius Ceasar Essay -- William Shakespeare
In Shakespeareââ¬â¢s tragedy Julius Caesar, the use of diverse leaders plays an important role in the plot, showing vividly how strong personalities conflict. This is the case with Brutus and Cassius, the two leaders among the several conspirators. The story of Julius Caesar is set in ancient Rome during a time when Julius Caesar is to become king. This, however, angers Cassius, a nobleman, and he plots with Brutus and others to kill him before he becomes king. They do just that, justifying their actions by saying Caesar was too ambitious and would have gone insane with power. This backfires with the Roman citizens after an emotional speech by Mark Antony, Caesarââ¬â¢s right hand man. This forces the conspirators to flee Rome and go to war with Antony and eventually take their own lives. Because of their great leadership qualities, Brutus and Cassius take the leader roles among the conspirators. Nevertheless, they at times do argue over the course of action. Though Brutus and C assius are both similar in that they are great leaders, their differences in character are instrumental in determining the conclusion of the play. à à à à à Despite their differences, Brutus and Cassius have similar traits that give rise to great leaders. Both Brutus and Cassius are noble, intelligent men. They usually have good intentions and understand the situation they are in. This is why they both agree to go along with the conspiracy to kill Caesar. The two also like to think out and plan their actions. They do this two significant times in the play. When the two plan Caesarââ¬â¢s assassination and during the planning of the final move for Brutus and Cassiusââ¬â¢ army. When the assassination is developing, Cassius thinks to kill Antony as well as Caesar saying, ââ¬Å"Mark Antony, so well beloved of Caesar, Should outlive Caesar. We shall find of him A shrewd contriver; and you know his means, If he improve them, may well stretch so far As to annoy us all. Which to prevent, Let Antony and Caesar fall togetherâ⬠(2.1.157-162). Brutus, however, responds with his own reasoning, ââ¬Å"Our course will see n too bloody, Caius Cassius, To cut the head off and then hack at the limbs, Like wrath in death and envy afterwards; For Antony is but a limb of Caesarâ⬠(2.1.163-166). They two are also self reliant and self-dependent. They can think and act for themselves as they should any great man says Cassius to Brutus, ââ¬Å"Me... ...derable differences in trust and loyalty are the ultimate factors that influence the conclusion of the play. Both of these characters have great qualities such as intelligence, self-dependence, and reasoning ability that make them excellent leaders. It, however, is their differences that govern the end result of the conspiracy. The single most outstanding decision of the play was when the conspirators resolved not to kill Antony along with Caesar. Brutusââ¬â¢ overwhelming trust of Antony led him to believe Antony was not going to be a problem. There are many implications of leadership as seen in Julius Caesar. Those who tend to exhibit strong leadership characteristics will have much more impact on those who tend to stand back and fall into the crowd, even if the decisions being made are illogical. When two strong leaders interact, there usually is a disagreement on the course of action, which can be harmful for the group. The strong characters of Brutus and Cassius, and the w eaker conspirators, prove both these conclusions. Works Cited Shakespeare, William. "The Tragedy of Julius Caesar." Houghton Mifflin Company. The Riverside Shakespeare. Ed. G. Blakemore Evans. Boston, 1994.
Thursday, January 16, 2020
Doctrine of adequacy and sufficiency Essay
This essay critically explores the doctrines of consideration and sufficiency within the context of contract law, with references to the matter of Thomas v Thomas from 1842. In assigning significance to these matters, it is noted that Sir John Patteson, a judge in 1830 who was appointed to the Court of Kingââ¬â¢s Bench, (later the Privy Council) was knighted shortly after making the landmark decision regarding the doctrine of consideration in the case of Thomas. The ratio decidendi in Thomas, was ââ¬Ë[c]onsideration must be of value and involve benefit or detrimentââ¬â¢ postulating further that ââ¬Ëalthough consideration must be sufficient, it need not be adequate. ââ¬â¢ CONSIDERATION Eleanor Thomas sued the executors of her husbandââ¬â¢s estate where the court ruled the agreement entered into, was neither nominal nor a voluntary gift, but sufficient in consideration. Consideration is the intention to create legal relations through a bargaining process affording a mutual exchange of a promise for a promise. In Beaton v McDivitt, it is evident that if a transfer was a gift, the essential component of bargaining would be absent. Consideration must be quid pro quo and result in a transfer between the promisor and the promisee, and result in the creation of a relationship of cause and effect. Only the parties involved can enforce the agreement. Consideration may also be a promise to refrain from doing something as Lush J in Currie v Misa states, ââ¬Ëa valuable consideration, in the sense of the law, may consist in some right, interest, profit, or benefit accruing to the one party, or some forbearance, detriment, loss or responsibility, given, suffered, or undertaken by the other. ââ¬â¢ Consideration can involve the forbearing to sue even if the case is unfounded. Past consideration may be valid where it was preceded by a request, however services that would not have been performed but for the implied promise of payment amounts to good consideration. WHEN CONSIDERATION IS NOT CONSIDERATION Consideration may be invalid as in Jones v Padavatton where under the doctrine of presumption, arrangements between family are not binding. Salmon LJ in Jones, in the dissenting obiter dictum, determined that the original agreement created an intention to create legal relations due to the financial consequences of the promise involved, however held there was no binding contract suggesting there was insufficient evidence to rebut the presumption against domestic arrangements. Consideration must be furnished at the time of agreement. Consideration is not valid where a promise to make payment has occurred after the act has been performed. Bargains and conditional gifts for a person who performs an act is not good consideration, nor is a promise to perform an existing duty, or an existing public duty, except where performance goes beyond required expectations. Illegality in consideration is not enforceable giving rise to the expression ââ¬Ëex dolo malo non oritur actioââ¬â¢ meaning ââ¬Ë[n]o court will lend its aid to a man who founds his cause of action upon an immoral or an illegal act. ââ¬â¢ Illusory consideration, where one partyââ¬â¢s obligations are amorphous, is not binding. Limitations and exceptions can apply to consideration however, where additional risks are undertaken. DOCTRINE OF SUFFICIENCY As in Thomas, common law substantially rests on the precept that consideration must be of value to be sufficient, even if it is nominal, without any quantitative economic postulation. Some may suggest such fiscally nominal or token consideration while sufficient, is commercially inadequate in the eyes of a reasonable person, and is itself, illusory. It may be suggested the court has extended itself to invent consideration, where equity may uphold promises not supported by good consideration, through the provision of promissory estoppel. It is incumbent on the parties only to determine the subjective and adequate worth of a promise. Patteson J articulates in Thomas, ââ¬Ëalthough consideration must be sufficient, it need not be adequate. ââ¬â¢ CONCLUSION Blackburn J statement of objective interpretation suggests the objective test must always apply in assessing how a reasonable person would view the situation. It can be concluded that consideration is a matter of essential promissory exchange, while adequacy and value, are the fiscal or functionary exclusive domain of the parties involved. Word count 691
Wednesday, January 8, 2020
Commonly Confused Words Accidental and Incidental
The adjectives accidental and incidental sound similar but have different meanings. Definitions The adjective accidental means unintentional or happening by chance. The adjective incidental means secondary or nonessential. It often refers to something that occurs in connection with a more important activity or event. Examples According to the National Safety Council, there were more than 600 accidental shooting deaths in the United States last year.We can reduce the risk of setting offà accidentalà nuclear war by retiring nuclear cruise missiles and instead rely on conventional weapons.(Dianne Feinstein and Ellen O. Tauscher, A Nuclear Weapon That America Doesnt Need. The New York Times, June 17, 2016)à à Traditionally, vocabulary learning was often left to look after itself and receivedà only incidentalà attention in many textbooks and language programs.(J.C. Richards and W.A. Renandya, Methodology in Language Teaching. Cambridge University Press, 2002)à We had to save everything we could against the worst possibilities. As for incidentals, they were going to be very incidental indeed. Scratch those too.(Wallace Stegner, Crossing to Safety, 1987)à Usage Notes What is accidental happens by chance: We didnt plan our meeting at the restaurant; it was accidental.What is incidental occurs as a minor consequence of something more important: The main advantage of a small car is that it is inexpensive; an incidental advantage is that it is easier to park than a larger car.(Rod Evans,à The Artful Nuance: A Refined Guide to Imperfectly Understood Words in the English Language, 2009) Idiom Alert The expression accidentally on purpose means as if by accident but actually by intention. If you do something accidentally on purpose, youre only pretending that it occurred by chance. The expression accidentally on purpose is an example of an oxymoron.ExampleGently I picked up the fabric scrap. I wonder what it was doing behind the mantel. Maybe her mother had propped it up there to display, and then it accidentally fell behind it and was forgotten.Or maybe, Jack added, her motherà accidentally on purposeà lost it.I finally looked at him. What do you mean?When I was a little boy, I had a favorite book that I made my mother read to me at bedtime at least sixteen times each night. It had lots of different characters, so when she read it, she had to make up all those voices. It must have been exhausting for her. He looked down at the sampler for a moment, smiling to himself. Anyway, one day the book just vanished. She helped me look and look for that book, but we never did find it. It was only a couple of years ago that she finally confessed to me that she hid it in the bottom of her cedar chest, where I would never find ità because she thought she might go mad if she ever had to read it again.(Karen White,à The House on Tradd Street. New American Library, 2008) Practice (a) When you travel on business, _____ expenses are items such as local transportation, telephone calls, tips, and laundry.(b) _____ fires are more likely to start in the kitchen than in any other room in the house. Answers (a) When you travel on business,à incidentalà expenses are items such as local transportation, telephone calls, tips, and laundry.(b)à Accidentalà fires are more likely to start in the kitchen than in any other room in the house.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)